– Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

Henry Alfred Goolsbee reminds government officials in New Zealand that: “Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction.” ~ Crimes Act New Zealand – Section 116: amended, on 18 June 2002, by section 6(1) of the Crimes Amendment Act 2002 (2002 No 20).

The Office of Numerous New Zealand Ministers (including but not limited to those pictured herein) were notified of the numerous ongoing miscarriages of justice including Henry Alfred Goolsbee’s wrongful arrest and wrongful imprisonment.

The ministers all chose to ignore Goolsbee’s (and other’s) plight.

Further investigations indicates that many people in New Zealand share Goolsbee’s opinion and believe that these and other cohorts are involved in countless corrupt and inappropriate activities that are Unbecoming of a Government and Ministerial Officer.

These Ministers should all be investigated (in exquisite detail) for numerous instances of inappropriate behavior,  involving many individuals who have likewise wrongfully been accused and convicted.

The usual procedure is to pass-off issues that require urgent attention to other officials and ministers, like a game of musical chairs…

The usual procedure is to pass-off issues that require urgent attention to other officials and ministers, like a game of musical chairs, in an effort to wear down the resolve of individuals making legitimate complaints. They waste the time, energy and financial resources of the victims in hopes that they will become exhausted and give-up on the complaints procedure.

When complainants follow through the most common trick is to find some rule to dismiss the complaint.

When complainants follow through, up to the highest levels (in an effort to escape the hamster-wheels of government-created marry-go-rounds), the most common trick of government officials, is to find some rule to dismiss the complaints, regardless of how critical or severe the matters might be.

Then the judiciary takes over and proceeds to further exhaust and frustrate the victim, protecting the unsavory government officials with endless rounds of bogus court proceedings.

If a complainant perseveres,  the judiciary takes over and proceeds to further exhaust and frustrate the victim, protecting the unsavory government officials with endless rounds of bogus court proceedings. As many now believe, these mock trials and other court proceedings as intended to create and foster the facade that New Zealand’s government is not engaged in corrupt and despicable behavior. However, there are tens of thousands of citizens from around the world including tens of thousands New Zealanders who heartily agree with this point of view. Goolsbee has accumulated sufficient evidence to confidently assert that the collusion between various New Zealand government officials is tantamount to “Crimes Against Humanity,” and criminal activity under the Crimes Act of New Zealand including but not limited to Section 116.

116 Conspiring to defeat justice

Compare: 1908 No 32 s 137

Is Sally Kidson, Nelson Mail reporter an irresponsible and negligent journalist?

Many might share Goolsbee’s opinion that she is a mere puppet of the corruption that plagues New Zealand government.

Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.

Journalists should:

– Never deliberately distort facts or context, including visual information. 

– Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story. 

– Gather, update and correct information throughout the life of a news story. 

– Consider sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Reserve anonymity for sources who may face danger, retribution or other harm, and have information that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Explain why anonymity was granted. 

– Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing. 

– Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless. 

– Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant. 

– Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all. 

– Boldly tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience. Seek sources whose voices we seldom hear. 

---

Minimize Harm

Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should:

– Consider the long-term implications of the extended reach and permanence of publication. Provide updated and more complete information as appropriate. 

– Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness. 

– Show compassion for those who may be affected by news coverage. Use heightened sensitivity when dealing with juveniles, victims of sex crimes, and sources or subjects who are inexperienced or unable to give consent. Consider cultural differences in approach and treatment. 

– Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast. 

– Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention. Weigh the consequences of publishing or broadcasting personal information. 

– Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do. 

– Balance a suspect’s right to a fair trial with the public’s right to know. Consider the implications of identifying criminal suspects before they face legal charges.